4.7 Article

Characterization and mechanism of the Cd(II) removal by anaerobic denitrification bacterium Pseudomonas sp. H117

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 222, Issue -, Pages 970-979

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.192

Keywords

Mixotrophic denitrification; Mn(II) oxidation; Response surface methodology (RSM); Cadmium removal mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51678471]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0400706]
  3. Key Scientific Technological Innovation Team Plan of Shanxi Province [2017KCT-19-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toxic heavy metal containing Cd(II) species is a serious threat for ecological environmental and many aquatic organisms. This work is aimed at evaluating the performance of Cd(II) and nitrate removal by Pseudomonas sp. H117. Response surface methodology (RSM) experiments showed that the maximum Cd(II) removal efficiency of 85.67% was obtained under the optimum conditions: temperature of 30.48 degrees C, Mn(11) concentration of 52.13 mg L-1 and Cd(II) concentration of 12.78 mg L-1. The mechanism of Cd(II) removal was investigated, the results indicated that MnO2 adsorption and pH value increase were the main contributor to remove Cd(II). Moreover, meteorological chromatography analysis indicated that the characteristics of gas composition could be influenced by Cd(II). Sequence amplification identified the presence of the MCO (multicopper oxidase) gene in strain H117, indicating that the strain has the capacity to oxidize the Mn(II). XRD and SEM analysis confirmed that the oxide of Mn(II) was MnO2. XPS spectra indicated that the Cd(II) was adsorbed onto MnO2 . These results indicated that strain H117 has the ability to perform simultaneous remove nitrate, Cd(II) and Mn(II), the process provided a potential for the treatment of complex polluted water. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available