4.7 Article

Efficient near-infrared photocatalysts based on NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+@ NaYF4:Yb3+, Nd3+@TiO2 core@shell nanoparticles

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 361, Issue -, Pages 1089-1097

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.174

Keywords

Near-infrared irradiation; Photocatalyst; Upcoversion; Core@shell structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21333006, 21573135, 51602179]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2013CB632401]
  3. Young Scholars Program [2015WLJH35]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2018JC039]
  5. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we fabricated NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+@NaYF4:Yb3+, Nd3+@TiO2 (Tm@Nd@TiO2) core@shell nanoparticles and investigated their near-infrared (NIR) photocatalytic activities. Comparing to traditional TiO2 based upconversion (UC) photocatalysts (i.e., NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+@TiO2, named Tm@TiO2), Tm@Nd@TiO2 exhibits enhanced photocatalytic activity under NIR light irradiation. The photocatalytic activity of Tm@Nd@TiO2 under 980, 808, and 980+ 808 nm laser irradiation is 4.40, 5.84, and 9.83 times as high as that of Tm@TiO2 under only 980 nm irradiation, respectively. The ethylene degradation rate of Tm@Nd@TiO2 under 980 + 808 nm laser irradiation is 6.4 times as that of Tm@TiO2. The photocatalytic activity of Tm@Nd@TiO2 under visible + NIR irradiation is even comparable with (similar to 2/3) that under UV light irradiation during Rhodamine B (RhB) degradation. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of Tm@Nd@TiO2 can be attributed to the stronger light absorption in NIR region ascribed to Nd3+, lower water absorption and the enhanced UC emission of Tm@Nd with unique core@shell nanostructures. This work can provide a possible route to improve the NIR photocatalytic activity and stimulate the applications in many other fields.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available