4.7 Review

State-of-the-art materials for high power and high energy supercapacitors: Performance metrics and obstacles for the transition from lab to industrial scale - A critical approach

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 374, Issue -, Pages 1153-1179

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.207

Keywords

Supercapacitor; Review; Materials; Performance; Scalability

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia, FCT [PD/BD/128169/2016, UID/GEO/50019/2019]
  2. UK EPSRC Joint University Industry Consortium for Energy (Materials) and Devices Hub [EP/R023662/1]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/GEO/50019/2019, PD/BD/128169/2016] Funding Source: FCT
  4. EPSRC [EP/R023662/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing field of supercapacitors has already gained enough maturity and complexity to be the object of highly specific reviews. This review aims to provide a comprehensive outline of the topic, by presenting the state-of-the-art electrolytes and electrode materials used in supercapacitors as well as the relationship between their intrinsic features and their key performance indicators. This analysis is complemented by numerous examples of recent literature-reported performances of hybrid supercapacitors. To aid comparison, these are listed in tables and shown in plots, organized by type of electrode material and by type of electrolyte. Finally, performance differences between lab scale and commercial scale devices are put in perspective, by exploring, on one hand, the obstacles to the transition from promising lab scale to industrial scale devices and by explaining, on the other hand, the reasons why the same type of electrode material and electrolyte combination often perform more poorly in real-world devices. With this approach, the authors expect to give a useful insight (and a comprehensive snapshot) into the challenges that need to be surpassed to bridge the gap between lab scale and industrial scale devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available