4.7 Article

Transparent magneto-optical Ho2O3 ceramics: Role of self-reactive resultant oxyfluoride additive and investigation of vacuum sintering kinetics

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 14761-14767

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.203

Keywords

Holmium oxide; Magneto optics; Transparent ceramics; Diffusion; Kinetics; Additives

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702171]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY17E020002]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Qianjiang Talent Program of China
  4. K.C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polycrystalline transparent magneto-optical Ho2O3 ceramics were successfully fabricated by vacuum sintering using the self-reactive resultant HoOF as a sintering aid. They had an in-line transmittance of 72.0% at 1550 nm and the wavelength-dependent Verdet constants of -182 +/- 8, -46 +/- 3, and -22 +/- 2 rad/Tm at 633, 1064 and 1550 nm (approximately 1.3 times those of terbium gallium garnet ceramics), respectively. The HoOF additive was generated by pyrolyzing Ho(OH)(2)F from the chemical reaction between the layered Ho-2(OH)(5)NO3 compound and NH4F in the liquid phase. The role of the HoOF additive and the sintering kinetics of the Ho2O3 ceramic were systematically studied. The results show that: (1) the proper amount of F- additive helps to obtain an oxide powder with a narrow particle distribution and significantly improves the optical quality of the sintered body; (2) HoOF induces a transient second phase to effectively suppress the grain growth in the Ho2O3 ceramics during sintering; (3) the diffusion mechanism is primarily controlled by grain-boundary diffusion around 1400 degrees C; (4) the activation energy of the grain-boundary-controlled diffusion was determined to be approximately 545 kJ/mol via the grain growth method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available