4.7 Article

Creep and thermal cracking of ultra-high volume fly ash mass concrete at early age

Journal

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages 191-202

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.02.018

Keywords

Ultra-high volume fly ash mass concrete; Creep; Thermal cracking; Early age; TSTM test

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51479178, 51879235]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY14E090006]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Durability for Civil Engineering [GDDCE15-01, GDDCE14-01]
  4. Postgraduate Education Reform Project [2016-ZX-236]
  5. China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base [2017D01023]
  6. RE-CAST University Transportation Center at Missouri University of Illinois

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental study characterized fresh and hardened ultra-high volume fly ash mass concrete (HP-HVFA, with 80% fly ash and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.26) and normal content fly ash mass concrete (NS-FA, with 35% fly ash and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.43). The creep and thermal cracking behaviors of the HP-HVFA and NS-FA concrete were evaluated using a temperature stress testing machine (TSTM). A series of TSTM tests were conducted under an adiabatic curing mode and a temperature matched curing (TMC) mode. The results indicate that HP-HVFA concrete had moderate strength at early age and desirable fresh and hardened engineering properties. Under the both curing modes studied, HP-HVFA exhibited lower hydration temperature rise. Under the TMC mode, both compressive and tensile creep of HP-HVFA were lower than that of NS-FA although their specific creep and creep-to-shrinkage strain ratio at time of cracking were almost the same. Under adiabatic mode, HP-HVFA had higher creep strain, specific creep, and creep-to-shrinkage strain ratio than NS-FA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available