4.7 Article

PAX3 Confers Functional Heterogeneity in Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Responses to Environmental Stress

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 958-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.03.019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM) via TRANSLAMUSCLE [19507]
  2. Labex REVIVE [ANR-10-LABX-73]
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM) [FDT20130928236, DEQ20130326526]
  4. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) grant for bone-muscle-repair [ANR-13-BSV1-0011-02]
  5. BMP-myomass [ANR-12-BSV1-0038-04]
  6. Satnet [NR-15-CE13-0011-01]
  7. BMP-MyoStem [ANR-16-CE14-0002-03]
  8. MyoStemVasc [ANR-17-CE14-0018-01]
  9. RHU CARMMA [ANR-15-RHUS-0003]
  10. NIH [HL60714]
  11. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-13-BSV1-0011] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Muscle satellite cells (MuSCs) are the quiescent muscle stem cells required for adult skeletal muscle repair. The impact of environmental stress such as pollution on MuSC behavior remains unexplored. We evaluated the impact of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) exposure, a ubiquitous and highly toxic pollutant, on MuSCs by combining in vivo mouse molecular genetic models with ex vivo studies. While all MuSCs express the transcription factor PAX7, we show that a subset also express PAX3 and exhibit resistance to environmental stress. Upon systemic TCDD treatment, PAX3-negative MuSCs display impaired survival, atypical activation, and sporadic differentiation through xenobiotic aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling. We further show that PAX3-positive MuSCs become sensitized to environmental stress when PAX3 function is impaired and that PAX3-mediated induction of mTORC1 is required for protection. Our study, therefore, identifies a functional heterogeneity of MuSCs in response to environmental stress controlled by PAX3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available