Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: Matched-Pair IABP-SHOCK II Trial 30-Day Mortality Analysis
Benedikt Schrage et al.
CIRCULATION (2019)
Analysis of outcomes for 15,259 US patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMICS) supported with the Impella device
William W. O'Neill et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2018)
Predictors of intra-aortic balloon pump hemodynamic failure in non-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock
Steven Hsu et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2018)
One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock
H. Thiele et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative
Mir B. Basir et al.
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS (2018)
Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation in the therapy of cardiogenic shock (ECMO-CS): rationale and design of the multicenter randomized trial
Petr Ostadal et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE (2017)
Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Dagmar M. Ouweneel et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2017)
Effect of Early Initiation of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Survival in Cardiogenic Shock
Mir B. Basir et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2017)
Intra-Aortic Balloon Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock: Clinical Response and Predictors of Stabilization
Marc A. Sintek et al.
JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE (2015)
National Trends in the Utilization of Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support Incidence, Outcomes, and Cost Analysis
Robert Stretch et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2014)
Differences in the Profile, Treatment, and Prognosis of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock by Myocardial Infarction Classification A Report From NCDR
Monique L. Anderson et al.
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES (2013)
Percutaneous Left-Ventricular Support With the Impella-2.5-Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock Results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-Registry
Alexander Lauten et al.
CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE (2013)
Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: Design and rationale of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial
Holger Thiele et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2012)
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Myocardial Infarction
Melchior Seyfarth et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2008)
Cardiac power output predicts mortality across a broad spectrum of patients with acute cardiac disease
Dorinna D. Mendoza et al.
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL (2007)
Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricutar assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
H Thiele et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2005)
Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: A report from the SHOCK trial registry
R Fincke et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2004)
Cardiogenic shock caused by right ventricular infarction - A report from the SHOCK registry
AK Jacobs et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY (2003)