4.8 Article

Structure-dependent electrical properties of graphene nanoribbon devices with graphene electrodes

Journal

CARBON
Volume 146, Issue -, Pages 36-43

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.01.071

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry for Research (MIUR) through the FIR grant [RBFR13YKWX]
  2. European Community through the FET-Proactive Project MoQuaS [610449]
  3. Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under GrapheneCore1 [696656]
  4. Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under GrapheneCore2 [785219]
  5. Max Planck Society
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [20PC21_155644]
  7. Office of Naval Research BRC Program [N00014-12-1-1009]
  8. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [20PC21_155644] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) are a novel and intriguing class of materials in the field of nanoelectronics, since their properties, solely defined by their width and edge type, are controllable with high precision directly from synthesis. Here we study the correlation between the GNR structure and the corresponding device electrical properties. We investigated a series of field effect devices consisting of a film of armchair GNRs with different structures (namely width and/or length) as the transistor channel, contacted with narrowly spaced graphene sheets as the source-drain electrodes. By analyzing several tens of junctions for each individual GNR type, we observe that the values of the output current display a width-dependent behavior, indicating electronic bandgaps in good agreement with the predicted theoretical values. These results provide insights into the link between the ribbon structure and the device properties, which are fundamental for the development of GNR-based electronics. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available