4.3 Article

Population-based relative risks for specific family history constellations of breast cancer

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 581-590

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-019-01171-5

Keywords

Breast cancer; Relative risk; UPDB; Family history; Individualized risk

Funding

  1. Utah Cancer Registry - National Cancer Institute's SEER Program [HHSN261201000026C]
  2. Utah State Department of Health
  3. University of Utah
  4. National Cancer Institute [P30 CA42014]
  5. George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
  6. Huntsman Cancer Foundation
  7. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [P30CA042014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeUsing a large resource linking genealogy with decades of cancer data, a non-traditional approach was used to estimate individualized risk for breast cancer (BC) based on specific family history extending to first cousins, providing a clearer picture of the contribution of various aspects of both close and distant combinations of affected relatives.MethodsRRs for BC were estimated in 640,366 females for a representative set of breast cancer family history constellations that included number of first- (FDR), second-(SDR), and third-degree relatives (TDR), maternal and paternal relatives, and age at earliest diagnosis in a relative.ResultsRRs for first-degree relatives of BC cases ranged from 1.61 (=1 FDR affected, CI 1.56, 1.67) to 5.00 (4 FDRs affected, CI 3.35, 7.18). RRs for second-degree relatives of probands with 0 affected FDRs ranged from 1.04 (=1 SDR affected, CI 1.00, 1.08) to 1.71 (4 SDRs affected, CI 1.26, 2.27) and for second-degree relatives of probands with exactly 1 FDR from 1.54 (0 SDRs affected, CI 1.47, 1.61) to 4.78 (5 SDRs; CI 2.47, 8.35). RRs for third-degree relatives with no closer relatives affected were significantly elevated over population risk for probands with5 affected TDRs RR=1.32, CI 1.11, 1.57).ConclusionsThe majority of females in the Utah resource had a positive family history of BC in FDRs to TDRs. Presence of any number of affected FDRs or SDRs significantly increased risk for BC over population risk; and more than four TDRs, even with no affected FDRs or SDRs, significantly increased risk over population risk. Risk prediction derived from the specific and extended family history constellation of affected relatives allows identification of females at increased risk even when they do not have a conventionally defined high-risk family; these risks could be a powerful, efficient tool to individualize cancer screening and prevention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available