4.7 Article

A holistic framework to utilize natural ventilation to optimize energy performance of residential high-rise buildings

Journal

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages 218-232

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.027

Keywords

Building information modelling; Computational fluid dynamics; Energy efficiency; High-rise buildings; Natural ventilation

Funding

  1. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Initiation Grant [IGN17EG04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel holistic framework was established using Building Information Modelling (BIM) to estimate accurately the potential of natural ventilation of residential high-rise buildings. This framework integrates Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation, multi-zone-air-flow modelling, and Building Energy Simulation (BES) to calculate ventilation rates under the mechanisms of wind-, buoyancy- and wind and buoyancy-driven ventilation. The framework was applied to a 40-storey residential building in Hong Kong for estimating the potential of natural ventilation in residential high-rise buildings. The results show that the building can save up to 25% of the electricity consumption if the building employs wind-driven natural ventilation instead of mechanical ventilation. The electricity consumption can be further reduced up to 45% by facilitating the buoyancy-driven natural ventilation. However, natural ventilation is found to be effective only if the temperature difference between indoor and outdoor is less than 2 degrees C. The study suggests to orienting residential high-rise buildings at an oblique angle with the prevalent wind direction than positioning perpendicular to the prevalent wind direction. Furthermore, the framework recommends promoting the wind- driven natural ventilation at top floors of residential high-rise buildings and to facilitate wind and buoyancy- driven natural ventilation at middle and lower floors of the buildings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available