4.7 Article

Family history of cancer and risk of paediatric and young adult's testicular cancer: A Norwegian cohort study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 120, Issue 10, Pages 1007-1014

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0445-2

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ExtraStiftelsen through the Norwegian Cancer Society [2016/FO76902]
  2. Research Council of Norway
  3. Wedel Jarlsbergs and Olav Raagholt og Gerd Meidel Raagholts Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the association of a family history of cancer with the risk of testicular cancer in young adults. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study including 1,974,287 males born 1951-2015, of whom 2686 were diagnosed with TC before the age of 30. RESULTS: A history of TC in male relatives was significantly associated with a diagnosis of TC among children and young adults, including brothers (6.3-fold), sons (4.7-fold), fathers (4.4-fold), paternal uncles (2.0-fold) and maternal uncles (1.9-fold). Individuals with a father diagnosed with a carcinoma or sarcoma showed an elevated risk (1.1-fold and 1.8-fold, respectively). A family history of mesothelioma was positively associated with a risk of TC [(father (2.8-fold), mother (4.6-fold) and maternal uncles and aunt (4.4-fold)]. Elevated risks were also observed when siblings were diagnosed with malignant melanoma (1.4-fold). The risk of TC was also increased when fathers (11.1-fold), paternal (4.9-fold) and maternal uncles and aunts (4.6-fold) were diagnosed with malignant neuroepithelial-tumours. CONCLUSION: We found an increased risk of TC among children and young adults with a family history of TC, carcinoma, mesothelioma, sarcoma, malignant melanoma and malignant neuroepithelial tumours. Hereditary cancer syndromes might underlie some of the associations reported in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available