4.5 Article

Metaplastic breast cancer has a poor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 176, Issue 3, Pages 709-716

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05264-2

Keywords

Metaplastic breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathological and clinical outcomes

Categories

Funding

  1. Mayo Clinic Breast Specialized Program of Research Excellence [P50CA116201]
  2. Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center [P30CA 15083-43]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveMetaplastic breast cancer (MetaBC) is a rare breast cancer subtype poorly responsive to systemic therapy in the metastatic setting with high recurrence rates in the adjuvant setting. However, limited data exist regarding response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We performed a single institutional study to assess the clinical and pathological complete response rates (pCR) of MetaBC to NAC.MethodsMayo Clinic Rochester patients with MetaBC treated with NAC were identified using the institutional medical index. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, chemotherapy treatment, clinical and pathological response, and long-term outcomes were reviewed. Pathologic response was assessed by direct pathology review (n=14) or review of outside surgical and pathology reports (n=4).ResultsWomen with MetaBC (n=18) received NAC from January 1991 to June 2014. The mean age was 50years (range 33-79) with a mean tumor size of 5.1cm (range 2.3-11cm) and 6/18 had pathologically confirmed lymph nodes prior to surgery. The majority (13/18; 72%) were estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER-2 negative (TNBC), and 1/18 (5.5%) was HER-2 positive. Five had BRCA testing and 2/5 were BRCA-2 positive. The chemotherapy regimens included anthracycline/cyclophosphamide (AC) (n=1), AC/taxane (n=3), AC/taxane/platinum (n=8), taxane/platinum-based regimens (n=4), taxane/cyclophosphamide (n=1) and taxane/trastuzumab (n=1). Five of 18 (28%) progressed on initial treatment including two who developed metastatic disease during NAC. The overall pCR rate was 2/18 (11%).ConclusionMetaBC is poorly responsive to NAC, with a pCR rate (11%), that is lower than expected in a predominantly TNBC cohort. MetaBC patients should be considered for clinical trials testing new NAC regimens and in the absence of clinical trial enrollment, MetaBC patients with resectable disease should proceed directly to definitive operative management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available