4.5 Article

Early life stress alters opioid receptor mRNA levels within the nucleus accumbens in a sex-dependent manner

Journal

BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 1710, Issue -, Pages 102-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.12.040

Keywords

Opioids; Nucleus accumbens; Amygdala; Early life stress; Development; Sex differences

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [IOS-1122074]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early life stress (ELS) strongly impacts mental health, but little is known about its interaction with biological sex and postnatal development to influence risk and resilience to psychopathologies. A number of psychiatric disorders, such as social anhedonia and drug addiction, involve dysfunctional opioid signaling; moreover, there is evidence for differential central opioid function in males vs. females. The present study examined opioid receptor gene expression in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and amygdala of male and female rats subjected to a neonatal predator odor exposure (POE) paradigm to model EIS. Brain tissue was collected at two developmental time points: neonatal and juvenile. Results showed that, following the neonatal POE experience, opioid receptor mRNA levels in the NAc were differentially regulated at the neonatal and juvenile time points. POE down-regulated neonatal mu- and kappa-opioid receptor mRNA levels in neonatal females, but upregulated mu- and delta-opioid receptor mRNA levels in juvenile females. Intriguingly, POE had no significant effect on NAc opioid receptor mRNA levels in males at either time point, indicating that the impact of POE on opioid system development is sex-dependent. Finally, POE failed to alter amygdalar opioid receptor gene expression in either sex at either time-point. The spatiotemporally- and sex-specific impact of ELS within the developing brain may confer differential risk or resilience for males and females to develop atypical opioid-regulated behaviors associated with conditions such as depression and addiction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available