4.5 Article

Rapid detection of invasive Mycobacterium chimaera disease via a novel plasma-based next-generation sequencing test

Journal

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 19, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4001-8

Keywords

Mycobacterium chimaera infection; Heater-cooler devices; Cell-free DNA; Next-generation sequencing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThere is an ongoing outbreak of Mycobacterium chimaera infections among patients exposed to contaminated heater-cooler devices used during cardiac surgery. Recognition of M. chimaera infection is hampered by its long latency and non-specific symptoms. Standard diagnostic methods using acid-fast bacilli (AFB) culture often require invasive sampling, have low sensitivity, and can take weeks to result. We describe the performance of a plasma-based next-generation sequencing test (plasma NGS) for the diagnosis of M. chimaera infection.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 10 patients with a history of cardiac surgery who developed invasive M. chimaera infection and underwent testing by plasma NGS between February 2017 and April 2018.ResultsPlasma NGS detected M. chimaera in 9 of 10 patients (90%) with invasive disease in a median of 4days from specimen collection, including all 8 patients with disseminated infection. In 7 of these 9 cases (78%), plasma NGS was the first test to provide microbiologic confirmation of M. chimaera infection. In contrast, AFB cultures required a median of 20days to turn positive, and the median time for confirmation of M. chimaera was 41days. Of 24 AFB blood cultures obtained in this cohort, only 4 (17%) were positive. Invasive procedures were performed in 90% of cases, and in 5 patients (50%), mycobacterial growth was achieved only by culture of these deep sites.ConclusionsPlasma NGS can accurately detect M. chimaera noninvasively and significantly faster than AFB culture, making it a promising new diagnostic tool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available