4.6 Article

Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the RAB5B gene 3′UTR region with polycystic ovary syndrome in Chinese Han women

Journal

BIOSCIENCE REPORTS
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20190292

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ19L27005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Previous genome-wide sequencing revealed that Ras-related protein Rab-5B (RAB5B) is a susceptible target in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods: Direct sequencing was performed to analyze the RAB5B gene rs1045435, rs11550558, rs34962186, rs705700, rs58717357, rs11171718, rs60028217, rs772920 loci genotypes in 300 PCOS patients and 300 healthy controls. The plasma microRNA (miRNA)-24, miR-320 levels weremeasured by reverse transcription fluorescent quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Results: The risk of PCOS in C allele carriers of RAB5B gene rs1045435 locus was 3.91 times higher than that of G allele. The risk of PCOS in rs11550558 locus G allele was 4.09 times higher than A allele. The risk of PCOS in rs705700 locus C allele was 1.66 times greater than T allele. The risk of PCOS in rs11171718 locus A allele carrier was 3.84 times higher than G allele. The rs11550558 SNP was associated with PCOS risk only in those with age >= 31.1 years. And RAB5B gene rs11550558, rs1045435, and rs11171718 SNPs were significantly associated with PCOS risk only in subjects with BMI >= 23.8 kg/m(2). We also found that the RAB5B gene rs1045435 SNP was associated with plasma miR-24 levels. The RAB5B gene rs11550558, rs705700, rs11171718 SNPs were correlated with plasma miR-230 levels. Conclusion: The single nucleotide polymorphisms of the rs1045435, rs11550558, rs705700, and rs11171718 loci of the RAB5B gene are associated with PCOS risk. The rs1045435 locus is likely an miR-24 binding site, while rs11550558, rs705700, and rs11171718 loci may be miR-320 binding sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available