4.8 Review

Biofouling of membranes in microbial electrochemical technologies: Causes, characterization methods and mitigation strategies

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 279, Issue -, Pages 327-338

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.001

Keywords

Membrane; Biofouling; Ion transport; Mass transfer; Microbial electrochemical technology; Microbial fuel cell

Funding

  1. Excellence of strategic R + D workshops (Development of modular, mobile water treatment systems and waste water treatment technologies based on University of Pannonia to enhance growing dynamic export of Hungary (2016-2020)) [GINOP-2.3.2-15]
  2. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  3. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities [UNKP-18-3]
  4. BMBF (Research Award Next generation biotechnological Processes-Biotechnology 2020+)
  5. Helmholtz-Association (Young Investigators Group)
  6. Helmholtz-Association within the Research Programme Renewable Energies
  7. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy [03KB115]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The scope of the review is to discuss the current state of knowledge and lessons learned on biofouling of membrane separators being used for microbial electrochemical technologies (MET). It is illustrated what crucial membrane features have to be considered and how these affect the MET performance, paying particular attention to membrane biofouling. The complexity of the phenomena was demonstrated and thereby, it is shown that membrane qualities related to its surface and inherent material features significantly influence (and can be influenced by) the biofouling process. Applicable methods for assessment of membrane biofouling are highlighted, followed by the detailed literature evaluation. Finally, an outlook on e.g. possible mitigation strategies for membrane biofouling in MET is provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available