4.8 Article

Co-pyrolysis of biomass and soapstock in a downdraft reactor using a novel ZSM-5/SiC composite catalyst

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 279, Issue -, Pages 202-208

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.119

Keywords

Downdraft system; Co-pyrolysis; Composite catalyst; ZSM-5; SiC ceramic foam

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21766019, 21878137]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province [20171BBF60023]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20181BAB206030]
  4. Research Project of State Key of Food Science and Technology [SKLF-ZZB-201722]
  5. Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Province Education Department [GJJ150213]
  6. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of New and Renewable Energy Research and Development [Y707sb1001]
  7. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Development Fund of One Thousand Program Talent [1001-02102082]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A ZSM-5/SiC composite catalyst was synthesized and characterized by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller analysis, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy in this study. The composite catalyst had the characteristics of ZSM-5 and SiC, and the surface of SiC grew evenly with a layer of ZSM-5. The effect of the composite catalyst on the product distribution and chemical composition in a co-pyrolysis downdraft system was investigated. In a down system with a catalytic temperature of 450 degrees C, a feed-to-catalyst ratio of 2: 1, and a soybean-soapstock-to-straw ratio of 1:1, the proportions of alkanes, olefins, aromatics, and phenoxy compounds were 6.82%, 4.5%, 73.56% and 11.11%, respectively. The composite catalyst combined the catalytic performance of ZSM-5 and SiC, increasing the proportion of aromatics and decreasing the proportion of oxygen-containing compound in the bio-oil. Moreover, the composite catalyst maintained its activity after reusing several times.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available