4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Bioelectrochemical evaluation of plant extracts and gold nanozyme-based sensors for total antioxidant capacity determination

Journal

BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 124-134

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.05.011

Keywords

Electrochemical sensors; Total antioxidant capacity; Water-soluble extracts; Gold nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS-UEFISCDI [PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-2801]
  2. Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, CCCDI -UEFISCDI, within PNCDI III [PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0062, 58]
  3. project PRO-DD (POS-CCE) [0.2.2.1., 123, SMIS 2637, 11/2009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The antioxidant properties of different plant extracts are usually claimed and used by food, medicine and cosmetic industry due to their health promoting capacities. In this study the presence of antioxidant compounds and the total antioxidant capacity of water-soluble extracts, prepared using two extraction methods and a variety of solvents, have been determined and a rapid screening method has been developed. Plant extracts characterisation, composition and antioxidant properties were confirmed by FTIR and Raman spectroscopies. Voltammetry, amperometry and electrochemical impedance were used to highlight the total antioxidant capacity of each extract using an electrochemical gold nanozyme-sensor based on the enzyme-like catalytic activity of gold nano particles. Both anodic area of cyclic voltammograms (10.31 mu A V) and electrochemical index (153) calculated using differential potential voltammetry show the total content of antioxidant compounds, allowing to discriminate between different extracts. Amperometric total antioxidant capacity measurements were associated with those from classical chemiluminescence and good correlation has been found (Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.958). (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available