4.6 Article

Incidence, factors, and clinical significance of cholesterol crystals in coronary plaque: An optical coherence tomography study

Journal

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
Volume 283, Issue -, Pages 79-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.02.009

Keywords

Acute coronary syndrome; Vulnerable plaque; Plaque rupture; Thin-cap fibroatheroma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Intraplaque cholesterol crystal (CC) is recognized as a component of vulnerable plaques. However, the clinical characteristics of patients with CC and the impact of CC on clinical events remain unknown. Methods: A total of 340 consecutive patients who underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of culprit lesions were included in the study. CC was defined as a thin linear structure with high reflectivity and low signal attenuation on OCT images. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-year was compared between patients with CC (CC group) and those without CC (non-CC group). MACE included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-TVR (NTVR). Results: CC was observed in 29% (n=98) of the patients. There was no significant difference in baseline clinical characteristics between the CC and non-CC groups, other than in eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)/arachidonic acid (AA) ratio (0.39 +/- 0.29 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.33, p=0.047) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (6.51 +/- 0.97 vs. 6.25 +/- 0.87%, p=0.016). The incidence of MACE and NTVR at 1-year was significantly higher in the CC group than in the non-CC group (15.3 vs. 7.9%, P=0.038; 8.1 vs. 2.5%, p=0.017). The presence of CC was significantly associated with a higher rate of 1-year MACE (odds ratio 4.78, confidential interval 2.02-10.10, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with CC in the culprit lesion had higher HbA1c and lower EPA/AA than patients without CC. The 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with CC in the culprit lesion were worse than in those without CC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available