4.6 Article

Explaining the decrease in ISM lithium at super-solar metallicities in the solar vicinity

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 623, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834203

Keywords

Galaxy: abundances; Galaxy: stellar content; stars: abundances

Funding

  1. DFG [283705981]
  2. ANR [14-CE33-014-01]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [MI 2009/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose here that the lithium decrease at super-solar metallicities observed in high-resolution spectroscopic surveys can be explained by the interplay of mixed populations that originate in the inner regions of the Milky Way disk. The lower lithium content of these stars is a consequence of inside-out disk formation plus radial migration. In this framework, local stars with super-solar metallicities would have migrated to the solar vicinity and depleted their original lithium during their travel time. To obtain this result, we took advantage of the AMBRE catalog of lithium abundances combined with chemical evolution models that take into account the contribution to the lithium enrichment by different nucleosynthetic sources. A large proportion of migrated stars can explain the observed lower lithium abundance at super-solar metallicities. We stress that no stellar model is currently able to predict Li-depletion for these super-solar metallicity stars, and solar Li-depletion has to be assumed. In addition, no solid quantitative estimate of the proportion of migrated stars in the solar neighborhood and their travel time is currently available. Our results illustrate how important it is to properly include radial migration when chemical evolution models are compared to observations, and that in this case, the lithium decrease at larger metallicities does not necessarily imply that stellar yields have to be modified, contrary to previous claims in the literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available