4.6 Article

Catalog of quasars from the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 3

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 624, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834794

Keywords

catalogs; surveys; quasars: general; large-scale structure of Universe; methods: data analysis; methods: observational

Funding

  1. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory under programme [177.A-3016, 177.A-3017, 177.A-3018]
  2. NOVA
  3. NWO-M grants
  4. Department of Physics & Astronomy of the University of Padova
  5. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  8. University of Arizona
  9. Brazilian Participation Group
  10. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  11. Carnegie Mellon University, University of Florida
  12. French Participation Group
  13. German Participation Group
  14. Harvard University
  15. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  16. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  17. Johns Hopkins University
  18. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  19. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  20. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, New Mexico State University, New York University
  21. Pennsylvania State University, University of Portsmouth
  22. Princeton University
  23. Spanish Participation Group, University of Tokyo, University of Utah
  24. Yale University
  25. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, MNiSW [DIR/WK/2018/12]
  26. MNiSW [212727/E-78/M/2018]
  27. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, NWO [614.001.451]
  28. National Science Centre, Poland [2017/26/A/ST9/00756]
  29. European Union [721463]
  30. MIUR Premiale
  31. 100 Top Talent Program of the Sun Yat-sen University, Guandong Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a catalog of quasars selected from broad-band photometric ugri data of the Kilo-Degree Survey Data Release 3 (KiDS DR3). The QSOs are identified by the random forest (RF) supervised machine learning model, trained on Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR14 spectroscopic data. We first cleaned the input KiDS data of entries with excessively noisy, missing or otherwise problematic measurements. Applying a feature importance analysis, we then tune the algorithm and identify in the KiDS multiband catalog the 17 most useful features for the classification, namely magnitudes, colors, magnitude ratios, and the stellarity index. We used the t-SNE algorithm to map the multidimensional photometric data onto 2D planes and compare the coverage of the training and inference sets. We limited the inference set to r < 22 to avoid extrapolation beyond the feature space covered by training, as the SDSS spectroscopic sample is considerably shallower than KiDS. This gives 3.4 million objects in the final inference sample, from which the random forest identified 190 000 quasar candidates. Accuracy of 97% (percentage of correctly classified objects), purity of 91% (percentage of true quasars within the objects classified as such), and completeness of 87% (detection ratio of all true quasars), as derived from a test set extracted from SDSS and not used in the training, are confirmed by comparison with external spectroscopic and photometric QSO catalogs overlapping with the KiDS footprint. The robustness of our results is strengthened by number counts of the quasar candidates in the r band, as well as by their mid-infrared colors available from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE). An analysis of parallaxes and proper motions of our QSO candidates found also in Gaia DR2 suggests that a probability cut of p(QSO) > 0.8 is optimal for purity, whereas p(QSO) > 0.7 is preferable for better completeness. Our study presents the first comprehensive quasar selection from deep high-quality KiDS data and will serve as the basis for versatile studies of the QSO population detected by this survey.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available