Induction of labor versus expectant management for gestational diabetes mellitus at term

PurposeTo evaluate whether induction of labor (IOL), as compared with expectant management, in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) mothers at term (between 37(0/7) and 40(6/7)), decreases caesarean section (CS) rate and the rate of adverse composite neonatal outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort study, of all women with GDM and a singleton gestation who delivered at term in a single, tertiary, university-affiliated medical center (2007-2014). We compared outcomes of women who underwent IOL at each week of gestation between 37(0/7) and 40(6/7)weeks with women who were managed expectantly. The primary outcome was CS rate.ResultsOverall, 2472 GDM patients included in the study, of which 880 women had IOL. CS rate was not found to be significantly different between the groups at any gestational age. IOL at 37weeks was associated with adverse composite neonatal outcome (aOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.6) and NICU admission (aOR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.4). At 38weeks, with NICU admission (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.9), and at 39weeks with fracture of the clavicle. In a sub-analysis of nulliparous women, IOL at 37weeks had higher odds of NICU admission and adverse composite neonatal outcomes, at 38weeks with CS and at 39weeks with fracture of the clavicle.ConclusionsIOL in GDM mothers at term does not reduce CS rate and may be associated with increased CS rate among nulliparous women at 38weeks. It is also associated with increased risk for adverse composite neonatal outcome or NICU admission when done prior to 39(0/7)weeks.