4.7 Article

Structural design optimization based on hybrid time-variant reliability measure under non-probabilistic convex uncertainties

Journal

APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 330-354

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.12.019

Keywords

Non-probabilistic time-variant hybrid reliability optimization; Convex mixed variables; The first-passage method; The improved GA algorithm

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [11602012, 11432002]
  2. Pre-research Field Foundation of Equipment Development Department of China [61402100103]
  3. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [2017ZA51012]
  4. Defense Industrial Technology Development Program [JCKY2016204B101, JCKY2017601B001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural safety assessment issue, considering the influence of uncertain factors, is widely concerned currently. However, uncertain parameters present time-variant characteristics during the entire structural design procedure. Considering materials aging, loads varying and damage accumulation, the current reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) strategy that combines the static/time-invariant assumption with the random theory will be inapplicable when tackling with the optimal design issues for lifecycle mechanical problems. In light of this, a new study on non-probabilistic time-dependent reliability assessment and design under time-variant and time-invariant convex mixed variables is investigated in this paper. The hybrid reliability measure is first given by the first-passage methodology, and the solution aspects should depend on the regulation treatment and the convex theorem. To guarantee the rationality and efficiency of the optimization task, the improved GA algorithm is involved. Two numerical examples are discussed to demonstrate the validity and usage of the presented methodology. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available