4.8 Article

Uncertainty estimation for wind energy conversion by probabilistic wind turbine power curve modelling

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages 1356-1370

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.180

Keywords

Energy conversion; Data clearing; Pitch angle; Probabilistic model; Uncertainty estimation; Wind turbine power curve

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFE0109000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51707063]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018ZD09, 2017MS024]
  4. Open Fund of Operation and Control of Renewable Energy & Storage Systems (China Electric Power Research Institute) [1810-00894]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes probabilistic wind turbine power curve (WTPC) models to quantify the uncertainties of energy conversion and highly scattered relationships of actual wind speed to power. First, new model inputs (i.e. pitch angle and wind direction) and novel data clearing methods are presented to improve the model accuracy, which is rare in the previous studies. Second, the models are established based on three nonparametric algorithms, i.e. Monte Carlo, neural network, and fuzzy clustering. Third, to fill the research gap on model evaluation, the desirable properties of a probabilistic WTPC model are defined as expected variance ratio (EVR), and this index is formulated by calculating the cumulative gaps between the simulated and actual power distribution in each wind speed segment. Data from two Chinese wind farms are used to validate and compare the proposed methods using the mainstream deterministic index and the proposed EVR. Results show that (i) new model inputs and data clearing methods are able to improve the accuracy for probabilistic models regardless of the afterwards modelling method; (ii) fuzzy outperforms other probabilistic models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available