4.8 Article

Fabrication of high photoreactive carbon nitride nanosheets by polymerization of amidinourea for hydrogen production

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 245, Issue -, Pages 197-206

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.044

Keywords

Carbon nitride; Nanosheet; Amidinourea; Visible; Photoreactivity; Hydrogen production

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672312, 21373275, 21503281, 21571192]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Univsrsity, South Central University for Nationalities [CZT18016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a typical visible-light-responsive organic semiconductor photocatalyst, graphitic carbon nitride (gCN) only exhibits moderate photoreactivity beacuse of its low specific area, limited light harvesting ability and quick recombination of photo-generated carriers. Herein, we report the fabrication of gCN nanosheets (gCN-NSs) with large BET surface area, excellent visible-light-absorptive property and efficient separation of carriers by direct polymerization of amidinourea, the product from the hydrolysis of dicyandiamine (DCDA). When compared with that of bulk gCN (SO) synthesized by direct polymerization of DCDA, the visible photocatalytic hydrogen evoluation rate of gCN-NSs (S2 sample) obtained by condensation of amidinourea improved 4.9, times, which is also 2.4 times higher than that of gCN-NSs (Su sample) which is prepared by polymerization of urea. The enhanced visible photocatalytic activity gCN-NSs (S2) toward hydrogen production can be ascribed to the combined effects of enlarged BET surface that provides more active sites for adsorption and photocatalytic reaction, compacted stsc stacking which facilitates the efficient separation of photo-generated carriers, negatively shifted CB potential and improved hydrophilic property that favor the electron transfer at the interfaces between gCN and water. In addition, the product yield of gCN-NSs (S2 sample) from the polymerization of amidinourea is 11.9%, which is 10.8 times higher than Su sample that prepared from urea (only 1.1%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available