4.4 Article

Novel and Rapid Deep Eutectic Solvent (DES) Homogeneous Liquid-Liquid Microextraction (HLLME) with Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS) Detection for the Determination of Copper in Vegetables

Journal

ANALYTICAL LETTERS
Volume 52, Issue 13, Pages 2092-2106

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2019.1598425

Keywords

Copper; 1,5-diphenyl carbazone (DPC); deep eutectic solvent (DES); fame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS); homogeneous liquid-liquid microextraction (HLLME)

Funding

  1. K.N. Toosi University of Technology (Tehran, Iran)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel and fast deep eutectic solvent (DES)-based homogeneous liquid-liquid microextraction (HLLME) was applied for the extraction of copper from vegetable samples followed by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). 1,5-diphenyl carbazone (DPC) was used as the chelating agent, and a DES was used as the extraction media. The utilized DES was based on benzyl triphenyl phosphonium bromide and ethylene glycol in a 1:8 mole ratio. The phase separation phenomenon was occurred by changing of sample temperature. Several factors influencing the extraction efficiency were investigated and optimized. Under the optimized conditions, an enhancement factor of 64 was obtained. The limit of detection, based on three signal-to-noise ratio, and limit of quantification were found to be 0.13 mu g L-1 and 5.0 mu g L-1, respectively. The calibration curve was linear within the range of 5.0-250 mu g L-1 with r(2) > 0.9957. Intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations (%) of 2.1% and 2.6% were obtained at the concentration of 25 mu g L-1. The accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated by analyzing a tomato leaves certified reference material and the results were to be in agreement with the certified value. Finally, the feasibility of the method was successfully confirmed by determination of copper in spinach, lettuce, broccoli, potato, carrot and parsley samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available