4.8 Article

A Doubly-Quenched Fluorescent Probe for Low-Background Detection of Mitochondrial H2O2

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 91, Issue 10, Pages 6902-6909

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01294

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21675132]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [13036]
  3. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [21521004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is an important product of oxygen metabolism and plays a crucial role in regulating a variety of cellular functions. Fluorescent probes have made a great contribution to our understanding of the biological role of endogenous H2O2. However, fluorescent probes for H2O2 featuring aryl boronates can suffer from moderate turn-on fluorescence responses. Strategies that can reduce the background fluorescence of these boronate-masked probes would significantly improve the sensitivity of endogenous H2O2 detection. In this work, we propose a general and reliable double-quenching concept for the design of fluorescent probes with low background fluorescence. A new fluorescent probe was developed for the detection of endogenous H2O2 in mitochondria of live cancer cells. This probe exploits a boronate-driven lactam formation and an eliminable quenching moiety simultaneously (i.e., the double-quenching effect) to reduce the background fluorescence, which ultimately results in the achievement of a >50-fold fluorescence turn-on. A linear concentration range of response between 1 and 60 mu M and a detection limit of 0.025 mu M can be obtained. This study not only presents a highly sensitive fluorescent probe for the detection of H2O2 but also provides a new concept for the design of fluorescent probes with a previously unachievable fluorescence off-on response ratio for other types of ROS and many other biologically relevant analytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available