4.4 Article

Experimental Evidence That Metamorphosis Alleviates Genomic Conflict

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 194, Issue 3, Pages 356-366

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/704183

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-1655092]
  2. Ecology, Evolution, Ecosystems, and Society graduate fellowship
  3. Cramer funds
  4. Guarini School of Graduate and Advanced Studies McCulloch Fellowship
  5. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) graduate fellowship [SwB 13442/13-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whenever genetically correlated traits experience antagonistic selection, an adaptive response in one trait can lead to a maladaptive response in the correlated trait. This is a form of genome-level conflict that can have important evolutionary consequences by impeding organisms from reaching their adaptive optima. Antagonistic selection should be pervasive in organisms with complex life histories because larval and adult life stages specialize in dramatically different environments. Since individuals express larval and adult morphologies from a single genome, genomic conflict across ontogenetic stages should also be prevalent. Using wood frogs as a study system, we measured natural selection on larval and postmetamorphic life stages and estimated genetic correlations among traits. Alternative life stages experienced a mix of both antagonistic and congruent viability selection. The integration between traits changed over the course of metamorphosis, reducing genetic correlations that cause conflict. Our results provide novel experimental evidence that metamorphosis can alleviate genomic conflict by partitioning life-history stages into modules that can more readily respond to selection. These results highlight the adaptive potential of metamorphosis as a means to avoid ecological specialization trade-offs. Moreover, they provide insights into the prevalence and evolutionary maintenance of complex life cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available