4.5 Article

Validation Study of Tumor Invasive Thickness for Postoperative Prognosis in 110 Patients Who Underwent Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma at a Single Institution

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 717-723

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001244

Keywords

distal cholangiocarcinoma; invasive tumor thickness; depth of invasive; prognosis; American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pT classification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) for distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC) is classified according to depth of invasion (DOI), which is the distance from the basal lamina to the most deeply advanced tumor cells. The Nagoya group proposed a new T classification for DCC based on invasive tumor thickness (ITT), which is the maximal vertical distance of the invasive cancer component (the ITT grade). In this study, we aimed to validate the ITT grade for the next pT classification of DCC in 110 patients. ITT could be measured in all patients, but DOI could only be measured in 62 (56%) patients. According to ITT grade, patients were classified into grades A to D, as follows: grade A, ITT <1mm (n=9); grade B, ITT 1mm or more but <5mm (n=35); grade C, ITT 5mm or more but <10mm (n=40); and grade D, ITT 10mm or greater (n=26). The median overall survival times in patients with ITT grades A, B, C, and D were 12.8, 5.7, 3.7, and 2.0 years, respectively. ITT grade could discriminate postoperative survivals between grades. On multivariate analysis, ITT grade, regional lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis were selected as independent prognostic factors. In summary, our results showed that ITT grade was a suitable alternative to DOI for pT classification in the next edition of the AJCC for DCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available