4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Practice patterns and knowledge among California pediatricians regarding human papillomavirus and its relation to head and neck cancer

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 525-529

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.04.011

Keywords

Human papillomavirus; HPV; Oropharyngeal cancer; Vaccination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To identify practice patterns regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination efforts and vaccination rates in context of head and neck cancer prevention, identify barriers to vaccination, and identify gaps in knowledge regarding the link between HPV and head and neck cancer in the pediatrician population. Study design/Methods: A 27-question cross-sectional survey was distributed to members of the four California chapters of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Results: Of the completed responses, 89.4% identified as always recommending the HPV vaccine to patients, but only 19.5% of pediatricians estimated that >75% of their eligible patients had completed the HPV vaccination series. 71.5% of respondents felt that further education about HPV's link to head and neck cancer them more comfortable discussing vaccination. Physicians who were in practice longer were less likely to respond that additional education about HPV and its link to head and neck cancer would make them more comfortable discussing vaccination with patients (p = 0.043). Physicians who were in practice longer were more likely to correctly respond that HPV type 16 is the most common strain linked to head and neck cancer (p = 0.021). Conclusion: There is need to improve both the knowledge base and comfort level of pediatricians in counseling their patients during vaccine recommendations. Otolaryngologists have a critical role in providing education to physicians, trainees, and the general public in the effort to combat the epidemic of HPV-associated head and neck cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available