4.5 Article

Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Nabilone for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 1161-1173

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.05.002

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; dementia; agitation; aggression; nabilone; cannabinoid; randomized controlled trial; neuropsychiatric symptoms

Funding

  1. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation [1012358]
  2. Alzheimer Society of Canada [15-17]
  3. Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) Team11
  4. Alzheimer Drug Discovery Foundation
  5. National Institute of Health
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  7. Axovant
  8. Lundbeck
  9. Roche
  10. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Doctoral Research Award
  11. Alzheimer's Association
  12. Scottish Rite Charitable Foundation of Canada
  13. Leducq Foundation
  14. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  15. CQDM
  16. Ontario Brain Institute
  17. Heart and Stroke Foundation
  18. W. Garfield Weston Foundation
  19. Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada
  20. National Institute on Aging
  21. ALS Society of Canada
  22. CHRP Collaborative Health Research Projects
  23. Brain Canada
  24. National Institute of Aging for Apathy in Alzheimer's Disease Methylphenidate Trial II (ADMET II) [R01AG046543]
  25. AbbVie
  26. GE Healthcare
  27. Eli Lilly
  28. Biogen Idec
  29. Novartis
  30. Genentech
  31. Optina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of nabilone for agitation in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). Design: This 14-week randomized double-blind crossover trial compared nabilone to placebo (6 weeks each) with a 1-week washout between phases. Setting: Patients were recruited from a long-term care facility and geriatric psychiatry clinics. Participants: Patients had AD (standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [sMMSE <= 24]) and agitation (Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version [NPI-NH]-agitation/aggression subscore 3). Intervention: Nabilone (target 1-2 mg) versus placebo. Measurements: The primary outcome was agitation (Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory [CMAI]). Secondary outcomes included NPI-NH total, NPI-NH caregiver distress, cognition (sMMSE and Severe Impairment Battery [SIB] or Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale of Cognition), global impression (Clinician's Global Impression of Change [CGIC]), and adverse events. Results: Thirty-nine patients (mean +/- SD age = 87 +/- 10, sMMSE = 6.5 +/- 6.8, CMAI = 67.9 +/- 17.6, NPI-NH total = 34.3 +/- 15.8, 77% male, nabilone dose = 1.6 +/- 0.5 mg) were randomized. There were no crossover or treatment-order effects. Using a linear mixed model, treatment differences (95% CI) in CMAI (b = -4.0 [-6.5 to -1.5], t(30.2) = -3.3, p = 0.003), NPI-NH total (b = -4.6 [-7.5 to -1.6], t(32.9) = -3.1, p = 0.004), NPI-NH caregiver distress (b = -1.7 [-3.4 to -0.07, t(33.7) = -2.1, p = 0.041), and sMMSE (b = 1.1 [0.1-2.0], t(22.6) = 2.4, p = 0.026) all favored nabilone. However, in those who completed the SIB (n = 25) treatment differences favored placebo (b = -4.6 [-7.3 to -1.8], t(20.7) = -4.8, p = 0.003). CGIC improvement during nabilone (47%) and placebo (23%) was not significantly different (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.09). There was more sedation during nabilone (45%) compared to placebo (16%) phases (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.02), but treatment-limiting sedation was not significantly different (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.22). Conclusions: Nabilone may be an effective treatment for agitation. However, sedation and cognition should be closely monitored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available