4.6 Review

The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy

Journal

ALLERGY
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 273-288

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/all.13848

Keywords

allergy; de-labeling; label; penicillin; testing

Funding

  1. NIH/NIGMS [5T32 GM007569-41]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1P50GM115305-01, 1P30AI110527-01A1, R21AI139021, R34AI136815]
  3. National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC) Foundation of Australia
  4. NHMRC
  5. National Centre for Infections in Cancer
  6. Austin Medical Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Even though 8%-25% of most populations studied globally are labeled as penicillin allergic, most diagnoses of penicillin allergy are made in childhood and relate to events that are either not allergic in nature, are low risk for immediate hypersensitivity, or are a potential true allergy that has waned over time. Penicillin allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broader spectrum antimicrobials and are associated with antimicrobial resistance. They may also delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy and lead to increased risk of specific adverse healthcare outcomes. Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing global focus. Methods: We performed an evidence-based narrative review of the literature of penicillin allergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillin allergy labels, and current approaches and barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling. Over the period 1928-2018 in Pubmed and Medline, search terms used included penicillin allergy or penicillin hypersensitivity alone or in combination with adverse events, testing, evaluation, effects, label, de-labeling, prick or epicutaneous, and intradermal skin testing, oral challenge or provocation, cross-reactivity, and antimicrobial stewardship. Results: Penicillin allergy labels are highly prevalent, largely inaccurate and their carriage may lead to unnecessary treatment and inferior outcomes with alternative agents as well as adverse public health outcomes such as antibiotic resistance. Conclusions: Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling as an aspect of ASP has become an increasing global focus. There is a need for validated approaches that optimally combine the use of history and ingestion challenge with or without proceeding formal skin testing to tackle penicillin allergy efficiently within complex healthcare systems. At the same time, there is great promise for penicillin allergy evaluation and de-labeling as an individual and public health strategy to reduce adverse healthcare outcomes, improve antimicrobial stewardship, and decrease healthcare costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available