4.6 Article

GRACE accelerometer data transplant

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 623-644

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2019.05.021

Keywords

Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment; GRACE; Accelerometer; Gravity field; Thruster spikes; Data transplant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last few months of GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) mission operation, the accelerometer (ACC) aboard GRACE-B was turned off due to battery problems. In order to compute a gravity field model for these months, a data processing strategy was developed to retrieve the missing information, the so called Accelerometer data transplant. The ACC data transplant uses linear accelerations as measured by the GRACE-A accelerometer to generate the missing GRACE-B ACC data. A simple method of ACC data transplant was presented by Save et al. (2006), which only applies attitude and time correction due to orbit separation. In this paper we present an improved method of the ACC data transplant, which also includes thruster spike correction. The thruster spikes are residual linear accelerations occurring at each thruster firing caused by thruster imperfections and misbalance. We provide detailed description of the thruster spike model, which was derived analytically based on the ACC transfer function and 10 Hz ACC data. Using the transplanted ACC data we computed the gravity field models for the months with missing GRACE-B ACC data (November 2016 June 2017). We show that the gravity field model based on in the improved ACC data transplant has significantly reduced noise, especially for degrees beyond the first orbital resonance, when compared to the simple transplant method. The improved ACC transplant became therefore a part of the processing standards for the upcoming JPL RLO6 gravity solution. (C) 2019 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available