4.8 Article

Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4)-Derived N-Rich Graphene with Tuneable Interlayer Distance as a High-Rate Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201901261

Keywords

few-layer graphene; graphitic carbon nitride; interlayer distance; nitrogen doping; sodium-ion batteries

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP140104062, DP160104866, DP170104464, DE150101234, LP160100927]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576202]
  3. Australian Research Council [DE150101234] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heteroatom-doped carbon materials with expanded interlayer distance have been widely studied as anodes for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). However, it remains unexplored to further enlarge the interlayer spacing and reveal the influence of heteroatom doping on carbon nanostructures for developing more efficient SIB anode materials. Here, a series of N-rich few-layer graphene (N-FLG) with tuneable interlayer distance ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 nm is successfully synthesized by annealing graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) under zinc catalysis and selected temperature (T = 700, 800, and 900 degrees C). More significantly, the correlation between N dopants and interlayer distance of resultant N-FLG-T highlights the effect of pyrrolic N on the enlargement of graphene interlayer spacing, due to its stronger electrostatic repulsion. As a consequence, N-FLG-800 achieves the optimal properties in terms of interlayer spacing, nitrogen configuration and electronic conductivity. When used as an anode for SIBs, N-FLG-800 shows remarkable Na+ storage performance with ultrahigh rate capability (56.6 mAh g(-1) at 40 A g(-1)) and excellent long-term stability (211.3 mAh g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1) after 2000 cycles), demonstrating the effectiveness of material design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available