4.5 Article

Serum levels of immunoglobulin G and complement 3 differentiate non-diabetic renal disease from diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

ACTA DIABETOLOGICA
Volume 56, Issue 8, Pages 873-881

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-019-01339-0

Keywords

Non-diabetic renal disease; Diabetic nephropathy; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Immunoglobulin G; Complement 3

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670662]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsHeavy proteinuria caused by non-diabetic renal disease (NDRD) is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to investigate specific predictors for NDRD in addition to traditional indicators in T2DM.MethodsA total of 341 patients with T2DM who underwent renal biopsy were retrospectively included. Eligible patients were divided into a nephrotic-range group (n=194) and a non-nephrotic-range group (n=147) based on proteinuria level. Risk factors for NDRD were evaluated using logistic regression, and the diagnostic implications of these variables were assessed by subgroup.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression indicated that serum IgG level (OR, 0.762; 95% CI, 0.628-0.924; p=0.006) was an independent predictor of NDRD in the nephrotic-range group. However, in the non-nephrotic-range group, increased C3 level was an independent risk factor for NDRD (OR, 1.313; 95% CI, 1.028-1.678; p=0.029). In the nephrotic-range group, the optimal cutoff value of IgG for predicting NDRD was 734.0mg/dl, with 67.8% sensitivity and 74.8% specificity, and IgG734.0mg/dl was the best predictor of NDRD. In the non-nephrotic-range group, the optimal cutoff value of C3 for predicting NDRD was 122.0mg/dl with low sensitivity (30.9%) but high specificity (97.8%).ConclusionsAt different levels of proteinuria, reduced IgG and increased C3 levels were independent indicators of NDRD in T2DM. Insights into these factors will help to advance the clinical management of NDRD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available