4.8 Article

Highly Strained III-V-V Coaxial Nanowire Quantum Wells with Strong Carrier Confinement

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 5931-5938

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b01775

Keywords

nanowire; III-V-V; quantum well; carrier collection; carrier confinement; laser

Funding

  1. Leverhulme Trust
  2. EPSRC [EP/P000886/1, EP/P006973/1, EP/P000916/1, EP/N509796/1]
  3. EPSRC National Epitaxy Facility
  4. Swedish Research Counsel
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P000967/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. EPSRC [EP/P000967/1, EP/P000886/1, 1764986] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coaxial quantum wells (QWs) are ideal candidates for nanowire (NW) lasers, providing strong carrier confinement and allowing close matching of the cavity mode and gain medium. We report a detailed structural and optical study and the observation of lasing for a mixed group-V GaAsP NW with GaAs QWs. This system offers a number of potential advantages in comparison to previously studied common group-V structures (e.g., AlGaAs/GaAs) including highly strained binary GaAs QWs, the absence of a lower band gap core region, and deep carrier potential wells. Despite the large lattice mismatch (similar to 1.7%), it is possible to grow defect-free GaAs coaxial QWs with high optical quality. The large band gap difference results in strong carrier confinement, and the ability to apply a high degree of compressive strain to the GaAs QWs is also expected to be beneficial for laser performance. For a non-fully optimized structure containing three QWs, we achieve low-temperature lasing with a low external (internal) threshold of 20 (0.9) mu J/cm(2)/pulse. In addition, a very narrow lasing line width of similar to 0.15 nm is observed. These results extend the NW laser structure to coaxial III-V-V QWs, which are highly suitable as the platform for NW emitters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available