4.8 Article

Nanoparticle Concentration vs Surface Area in the Interaction of Thiol-Containing Molecules: Toward a Rational Nanoarchitectural Design of Hybrid Materials

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages 17697-17705

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b03942

Keywords

nanosurface engineering; isothermal titration calorimetry; molecular dynamics; association models; cystein-containing peptides; silver nanoparticles; polydispersity

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) [RGPIN-2015-0632]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Sciences (CIHR)
  3. NSERC [RGPIN-2015-06503]
  4. CIHR [PJT-148869, PJT-148533]
  5. FONDECYT [1171155]
  6. Millennium Nucleus of Ion Channel Associated Diseases (MiNICAD), the Millennium Nucleus - Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio of the Ministry of Economy, Development and Tourism (Chile)
  7. Secyt-UNC [411/18]
  8. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Undergraduate Student Research Award
  9. Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of accounting for the total surface in the association of thiol-containing molecules to nanosilver was assessed using isothermal titration calorimetry, along with a new open access algorithm that calculates the total surface area for samples of different polydispersity. Further, we used advanced molecular dynamic calculations to explore the underlying mechanisms for the interaction of the studied molecules in the presence of a nanosilver surface in the form of flat surfaces or as three-dimensional pseudospherical nano structures. Our data indicate that not only is the total surface area available for binding but also the supramolecular arrangements of the molecules in the near proximity of the nanosilver surface strongly affects the affinity of thiol-containing molecules to nanosilver surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available