4.6 Article

Grading of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas by Using Machine Learning Based on Artificial Neural Networks and Radiomic Signatures Extracted From Multidetector Computed Tomography Images

Journal

ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 157-168

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.05.004

Keywords

Machine learning; Artificial neural networks; Radiomic signature; Texture feature; Computed tomography; Clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Funding

  1. China National Institutes of Health [81801671]
  2. Science and Technology Bureau of Luzhou China [12126]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale and Objectives: To evaluate the ability of artificial neural networks (ANN) fed with radiomic signatures (RSs) extracted from multidetector computed tomography images in differentiating the histopathological grades of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCCs). Materials and Methods: The multidetector computed tomography images of 227 ccRCCs were retrospectively analyzed. For each ccRCC, 14 conventional image features (CIFs) were extracted manually by two radiologists, and 556 texture features (TFs) were extracted by a free software application, MaZda (version 4.6). The high-dimensional dataset of these RSs was reduced using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. Five minimum mean squared error models (minMSEMs) for predicting the ccRCC histopathological grades were constructed from the CIFs, the TFs of the corticomedullary phase images (CMP), and the TFs of the parenchyma phase (PP) images and their combinations, respectively abbreviated as CIF-minMSEM, CMP-minMSEM, PP-minMSEM, CIF+CMP-minMSEM, and CIF+PP-minMSEM. The RSs of each model were fed 30 times consecutively into an ANN for machine learning, and the predictive accuracy of each time ML was recorded for the statistical analysis. Results: The five predictive models were constructed from 12, 19, and 10 features selected from the CIFs, the TFs of the CMP images, and that of PP images, respectively. On the basis of their accuracy across the whole cohort, the five models were ranked as follows: CIF+CMP-minMSEM (accuracy: 94.06% +/- 1.14%), CIF + PP-minMSEM (accuracy: 93.32% +/- 1.23%), CIF-minMSEM (accuracy: 92.26% +/- 1.65%), CMP-minMSEM (accuracy: 91.76% +/- 1.74%), and PP-minMSEM (accuracy: 90.89% +/- 1.47%). Conclusion: Machine teaming based on ANN helped establish an optimal predictive model, and TFs contributed to the development of high accuracy predictive models. The CIF+CMP-minMSEM showed the greatest accuracy for differentiating low- and high-grade ccRCCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available