4.3 Article

Influence of strain and chemical substitution on the magnetic anisotropy of antiferromagnetic Cr2O3: An ab-initio study

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.034405

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Nebraska Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) [DMR-1420645]
  2. Nanoelectronics Research Corporation (NERC), Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC), through the Center for Nanoferroic Devices (CNFD), a SRC-NRI Nanoelectronics Research Initiative Center [2398.001]
  3. Nebraska Research Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of the mechanical strain and chemical substitution on the magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE) of Cr2O3 is studied using first-principles calculations. Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction contributes substantially to MAE by inducing spin canting when the antiferromagnetic order parameter is not aligned with the hexagonal axis. Nearly cubic crystal field results in a very small MAE in pure Cr2O3 at zero strain, which is incorrectly predicted to be negative (in-plane) on account of spin canting. The MAE is strongly modified by epitaxial strain, which tunes the crystal-field splitting of the t(2g) triplet. The contribution from magnetic dipolar interaction is very small at any strain. The effects of cation (Al, Ti, V, Co, Fe, Nb, Zr, Mo) and anion (B) substitutions on MAE are examined. Al increases MAE thanks to the local lattice deformation. In contrast, the electronic configuration of V and Nb strongly promotes easy-plane anisotropy, while other transition-metal dopants have only a moderate effect on MAE. Substitution of oxygen by boron, which has been reported to increase the Neel temperature, has a weak effect on MAE, whose sign depends on the charge state of B. The electric field applied along the (0001) axis has a weak second-order effect on the MAE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available