4.7 Article

Validation of a Vasculogenesis Microfluidic Model for Radiobiological Studies of the Human Microvasculature

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admt.201800726

Keywords

apoptosis; DNA double-strand break; microvasculature; organs-on-a-chip; radiotherapy

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Centre for Excellence in Convergent Bio-Nano Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy is limited by acute or chronic side effects with often severe consequences to patients. The microvasculature is a central player involved in both tumor responses and healthy tissue/organ radiological injuries. However, current preclinical vascular models based on 2D culture offer only limited radiobiological insight due to their failure in recapitulating the 3D nature experienced by endothelial cells within the human microvasculature. To address this issue, the use of a 3D microvasculature-on-a-chip microfluidic technology is demonstrated in radiobiological studies. Within this vasculogenesis model a perfusable network that structurally mimics the human microvasculature is formed and the biological response to ionizing radiation including cellular apoptosis, vessel tight adherens junction breakage, DNA double strand break, and repair is systematically investigated. In comparison to cells grown in a 2D environment, human umbilical vein endothelial cells in the 3D microvasculature-on-a-chip displays significant differences in biological responses, especially at high X-ray dose. This data confirms the feasibility of using microvascular-on-a-chip models for radiobiological studies. Such vasculogenesis models have strong potential to yield more accurate prediction of healthy tissue responses to ionizing radiation as well as to guide the development of risk-reducing strategies to prevent radiation-induced acute and long-term side-effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available