4.7 Article

Preclinical immunogenicity and safety of the cGMP-grade placental malaria vaccine PRIMVAC

Journal

EBIOMEDICINE
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 145-156

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.010

Keywords

Malaria; Plasmodium; Vaccine; VAR2CSA; Placenta

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF), Germany through Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau (KfW) [202060457]
  2. Irish Aid, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Ireland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: VAR2CSA is the lead antigen for developing a vaccine that would protect pregnant women against placentalmalaria. A multi-system feasibility study has identified E. coli as a suitable bacterial expression platform allowing the production of recombinant VAR2CSA-DBL1x-2x (PRIMVAC) to envisage a prompt transition to current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) vaccine production. Methods: Extensive process developments were undertaken to produce cGMP grade PRIMVAC to permit early phase clinical trials. PRIMVAC stability upon storage was assessed over up to 3 years. A broad toxicology investigation was carried out in rats allowing meanwhile the analysis of PRIMVAC immunogenicity. Findings: We describe the successful cGMP production of 4. 65 g of PRIMVAC. PRIMVAC drug product was stable and potent for up to 3 years upon storage at -20 degrees C and showed an absence of toxicity in rats. PRIMVAC adjuvanted with Alhydrogel (R) or GLA-SE was able to generate antibodies able to recognize VAR2CSA expressed at the surface of erythrocytes infected with different strains. These antibodies also inhibit the interaction of the homologous NF54-CSA strain and to a lower extend of heterologous strains to CSA. Interpretation: This work paved the way for the clinical development of an easily scalable low cost effective vaccine that could protect against placental malaria and prevent an estimated 10,000 maternal and 200,000 infant deaths annually.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available