4.8 Article

No high Tibetan Plateau until the Neogene

Journal

SCIENCE ADVANCES
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav2189

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS [XDA20070301, XDA20070203]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [31470325, 31590823, 41430102, 41872006]
  3. NSFC-NERC (Natural Environment Research Council of the United Kingdom) joint research program [41661134049, NE/P013805/1]
  4. XTBG International Fellowship for Visiting Scientists
  5. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0505200]
  6. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDB-SSW-SMC016]
  7. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2017439, 2017103]
  8. CAS 135 program [2017XTBG-F01]
  9. NERC [NE/P013805/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Late Paleogene surface height and paleoenvironment for the core area of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) remain critically unresolved. Here, we report the discovery of the youngest well-preserved fossil palm leaves from Tibet. They were recovered from the Late Paleogene (Chattian), ca. 25.5 +/- 0.5 million years, paleolake sediments within the Lunpola Basin (32.033 degrees N, 89.767 degrees E), central QTP at a present elevation of 4655 m. The anatomy of palms renders them intrinsically susceptible to freezing, imposing upper bounds on their latitudinal and altitudinal distribution. Combined with model-determined paleoterrestrial lapse rates, this shows that a high plateau cannot have existed in the core of Tibet in the Paleogene. Instead, a deep paleovalley, whose floor was <2.3 km above mean sea level bounded by (>4 km) high mountain systems, formed a topographically highly varied landscape. This finding challenges prevailing views on tectonic processes, monsoon dynamics, and the evolution of Asian biodiversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available