4.6 Article

Assessment of Blood Tumor Mutational Burden as a Potential Biomarker for Immunotherapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Use of a Next-Generation Sequencing Cancer Gene Panel

Journal

JAMA ONCOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 696-702

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7098

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation Key Program [81630071, 81330062]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0902300]
  3. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [CIFMS 2016-12M-3-008]
  4. China National Natural Sciences Foundation [81871889]
  5. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7172045]
  6. Beijing Novel Program [7172045]
  7. Ministry of Education Innovation Team development project [IRT-17R10]
  8. CAMS Key Lab of Translational Research on Lung Cancer from the Education Ministry Innovative Research Team Program [IRT13003]
  9. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
  10. Aiyou Foundation [KY201701]
  11. [Z181100006218130]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IMPORTANCE Tumor mutational burden (TMB), as measured by whole-exome sequencing (WES) or a cancer gene panel (CGP), is associated with immunotherapy responses. However, whether TMB estimated by circulating tumor DNA in blood (bTMB) is associated with clinical outcomes of immunotherapy remains to be explored. OBJECTIVES To explore the optimal gene panel size and algorithm to design a CGP for TMB estimation, evaluate the panel reliability, and further validate the feasibility of bTMB as a clinical actionable biomarker for immunotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cohort study, a CGP named NCC-GP150 was designed and virtually validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The correlation between bTMB estimated by NCC-GP150 and tissue TMB (tTMB) measured by WES was evaluated in matched blood and tissue samples from 48 patients with advanced NSCLC. An independent cohort of 50 patients with advanced NSCLC was used to identify the utility of bTMB estimated by NCC-GP150 in distinguishing patients who would benefit from anti-programmed cell death 1(anti-PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) therapy. The study was performed from July 19, 2016, to April 20, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Assessment of the Spearman correlation coefficient between bTMB estimated by NCC-GP150 and tTMB calculated by WES. Evaluation of the association of bTMB level with progression-free survival and response to anti-PD-land anti-PD-Li therapy. RESULTS This study used 2 independent cohorts of patients with NSCLC (cohort 1: 48 patients; mean [SD] age, 60 [13] years; 15 [31.2%] female; cohort 2:50 patients; mean [SD] age, 58 [8] years; 15 [30.0%] female). A CGP, including 150 genes, demonstrated stable correlations with WES for TMB estimation (median r2 = 0.91; interquartile range, 0.89-0.92), especially when synonymous mutations were included (median r2 = 0.92; interquartile range, 0.91-0.93), whereas TMB estimated by the NCC-GP150 panel found higher correlations with TMB estimated by WES than most of the randomly sampled 150-gene panels. Blood TMB estimated by NCC-GP150 correlated well with the matched tTMB calculated by WES (Spearman correlation = 0.62). In the anti-PD-land anti-PD-Li treatment cohort, a bTMB of 6 or higher was associated with superior progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18-0.84; log-rank P =.01) and objective response rates (bTMB Tr.-6: 39.3%; 95% Cl, 23.9%-56.5%; bTMB <6: 9.1%; 95% Cl, 1.6%-25.9%; P =.02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings suggest that established NCC-GP150 with an optimized gene panel size and algorithm is feasible for bTMB estimation, which may serve as a potential biomarker of clinical benefit in patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-land anti-PD-Li agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available