4.6 Article

Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production

Journal

NATURE ENERGY
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 230-240

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-019-0333-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) through the REFUEL programme [DE-AR0000808]
  2. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) through the REBELS programme [DE-AR0000493]
  3. Army Research Office [W911NF-17-1-0051]
  4. Office of Naval Research [N00014-161-2780]
  5. National Science Foundation [DMR156375]
  6. Colorado School of Mines Foundation
  7. Colorado Office of Economic Development and International Trade (COEDIT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reversible fuel cells based on both proton exchange membrane fuel cell and solid oxide fuel cell technologies have been proposed to address energy storage and conversion challenges and to provide versatile pathways for renewable fuels production. Both technologies suffer challenges associated with cost, durability, low round-trip efficiency and the need to separate H2O from the product fuel. Here, we present a reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cell based on an yttrium and ytterbium co-doped barium cerate-zirconate electrolyte and a triple-conducting oxide air/steam (reversible) electrode that addresses many of these issues. Our reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cell achieves a high Faradaic efficiency (90-98%) and can operate endothermically with a > 97% overall electric-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency (based on the lower heating value of H2) at a current density of -1,000 mA cm(-2). Even higher efficiencies are obtained for H2O electrolysis with co-fed CO2 to produce CO and CH4. We demonstrate a repeatable round-trip (electricity-to-hydrogen-to-electricity) efficiency of >75% and stable operation, with a degradation rate of < 30 mV over 1,000 h.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available