4.3 Article

Diffusion tensor imaging of the kidney in healthy controls and in children and young adults with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease

Journal

ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 1867-1872

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01933-4

Keywords

DTI; Kidney; ARPKD; Magnetic resonance imaging; Urology; Diffusion tensor imaging

Funding

  1. NIH [5K23DK109203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo compare diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the kidneys and its derived parameters in children with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) versus healthy controls.MethodsIn a prospective IRB-approved study, we evaluated the use of DTI to compare kidney parenchyma FA values in healthy controls (age-matched children with no history of renal disease) versus patients with ARPKD. A 20-direction DTI with b-values of b=0s/mm(2) and b=400s/mm(2) was used to acquire data in coronal direction using a fat-suppressed spin-echo echo-planar sequence. Diffusion Toolkit and TrackVis were used for analysis and segmentation. TrackVis was used to draw regions of interest (ROIs) covering the entire volume of the renal parenchyma, excluding the collecting system. Fibers were reconstructed using a deterministic fiber tracking algorithm. The FA values based on the ROI data, mean length, and volume of the tracks based on the fiber tracking data were recorded.ResultsEight healthy controls (mean age=12.9years4.0; 1/8 males) and six ARPKD participants (mean age=13.8years +/- 8.5; 5/6 males) were included in the study. Compared to healthy controls, patients with ARPKD had significantly lower FA values (0.33 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.25 +/- 0.02, p=0.002) and mean track length (16.73 +/- 3.43 vs. 11.61 +/- 1.29mm, p=0.005).Conclusionp id=ParDTI of the kidneys shows significantly lower FA values and mean track length in children and young adults with ARPKD compared to normal subjects. DTI of the kidney offers a novel approach for characterizing renal disease based on changes in diffusion anisotropy and kidney structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available