4.6 Article

Polymer-Templated Gold Nanoparticles on Optical Fibers for Enhanced-Sensitivity Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensors

Journal

ACS SENSORS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 613-622

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.8b01372

Keywords

localized surface plasmon resonance; optical fiber; biosensor; gold nanoparticle; block copolymer

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [RGPIN-2016-03864]
  2. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Nature et Technologies (FRQ-NT) [205260]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61727816, 61520106013, 11474043]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dense arrays of well-dispersed gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) on optical fibers are shown to bridge the gap in sensitivity and sensing performance between localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) and classical SPR sensing. A simple self-assembly method relying on a poly(styrene-b-4-vinylpyridine) (PS-b-P4VP) block copolymer brush layer was used to immobilize AuNPs of different diameters from 10 to 92 nm on optical fibers. In comparison with standard AuNP deposition methods using (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane (APTMS) and polyelectrolytes, the sensitivity with the PS-b-P4VP templating method was found to be 3-fold better, a consequence of the smaller gap between particles and the presence of fewer AuNP aggregates. Hence, the sensitivity of the LSPR sensor for IgG was comparable to a classical SPR, also on optical fibers, and about 68% of that for a prism-based wavelength-interrogation SPR instrument. The reproducibility and the detection limit of the LSPR sensor were about the same as the SPR sensor. The enhanced performance of the LSPR sensors using the PS-b-P4VP block copolymer fabrication method paves the way for use of these LSPR biosensors in a smaller and more cost-effective platform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available