4.6 Article

Evolution of non-kin cooperation: social assortment by cooperative phenotype in guppies

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181493

Keywords

cooperation; assortment; guppy; social structure; social networks; predator inspection

Funding

  1. University of Copenhagen
  2. Carlsberg Foundation
  3. Leverhulme Trust [ECF/2010/0672, RPG-175]
  4. Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF-1323-00105]
  5. NERC [NE/L007371/1, NE/K004263/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cooperation among non-kin constitutes a conundrum for evolutionary biology. Theory suggests that non-kin cooperation can evolve if individuals differ consistently in their cooperative phenotypes and assort socially by these, such that cooperative individuals interact predominantly with one another. However, our knowledge of the role of cooperative phenotypes in the social structuring of real-world animal populations is minimal. In this study, we investigated cooperative phenotypes and their link to social structure in wild Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). We first investigated whether wild guppies are repeatable in their individual levels of cooperativeness (i.e. have cooperative phenotypes) and found evidence for this in seven out of eight populations, a result which was mostly driven by females. We then examined the social network structure of one of these populations where the expected fitness impact of cooperative contexts is relatively high, and found assortment by cooperativeness, but not by genetic relatedness. By contrast, and in accordance with our expectations, we did not find assortment by cooperativeness in a population where the expected fitness impact of cooperative contexts is lower. Our results provide empirical support for current theory and suggest that assortment by cooperativeness is important for the evolution and persistence of non-kin cooperation in real-world populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available