4.5 Article

Detection and characterization of MRI breast lesions using deep learning

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages 219-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.02.008

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Breast lesion detection; Convolution neural networks; Transfer learning; Attention model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of a deep learning model to discriminate between benign and malignant breast lesions using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and characterize different histological subtypes of breast lesions. Materials and methods: We developed a deep learning model that simultaneously learns to detect lesions and characterize them. We created a lesion-characterization model based on a single two-dimensional T1-weighted fat suppressed MR image obtained after intravenous administration of a gadolinium chelate selected by radiologists. The data included 335 MR images from 335 patients, representing 17 different histological subtypes of breast lesions grouped into four categories (mammary gland, benign lesions, invasive ductal carcinoma and other malignant lesions). Algorithm performance was evaluated on an independent test set of 168 MR images using weighted sums of the area under the curve (AUC) scores. Results: We obtained a cross-validation score of 0.817 weighted average receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-AUC on the training set computed as the mean of three-shuffle threefold cross-validation. Our model reached a weighted mean AUC of 0.816 on the independent challenge test set. Conclusion: This study shows good performance of a supervised-attention model with deep learning for breast MRI. This method should be validated on a larger and independent cohort. (C) 2019 Societe francaise de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available