4.7 Review

Slab rollback and microcontinent subduction in the evolution of the Zambales Ophiolite Complex (Philippines): A review

Journal

GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 23-36

Publisher

CHINA UNIV GEOSCIENCES, BEIJING
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.12.008

Keywords

Ophiolite; Slab rollback; Radiolarians; Subduction; Zambales; Philippines

Funding

  1. University of the Philippines-National Institute of Geological Sciences
  2. Department of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New radiolarian ages show that the island arc-related Acoje block of the Zambales Ophiolite Complex is possibly of Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous age. Radiometric dating of its plutonic and volcanic-hypabyssal rocks yielded middle Eocene ages. On the other hand, the paleontological dating of the sedimentary carapace of the transitional mid-ocean ridge - island arc affiliated Coto block of the ophiolite complex, together with isotopic age datings of its dikes and mafic cumulate rocks, also yielded Eocene ages. This offers the possibility that the Zambales Ophiolite Complex could have: (1) evolved from a Mesozoic arc (Acoje block) that split to form a Cenozoic back-arc basin (Coto block), (2) through faulting, structurally juxtaposed a Mesozoic oceanic crust with a younger Cenozoic lithospheric fragment or (3) through the interplay of slab rollback, slab break-off and, at a later time, collision with a microcontinent fragment, caused the formation of an island arc-related ophiolite block (Acoje) that migrated trench-ward resulting into the generation of a back-arc basin (Coto block) with a limited subduction signature. This Meso-Cenozoic ophiolite complex is compared with the other oceanic lithosphere fragments along the western seaboard of the Philippines in the context of their evolution in terms of their recognized environments of generation. (C) 2019, China University of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available