4.3 Article

Tutorial on the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of upconversion luminescence data

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2050-6120/ab02c6

Keywords

upconversion; nanoparticles; lanthanides; luminescence; tutorial

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IIP1414211, IIP1642634, IIP1722229, CHE1337707]
  2. NASA [NNX15AM83A]
  3. South Dakota Governor's Office of Economic Development through the Center for Fluorinated Functional Materials
  4. NASA [800373, NNX15AM83A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The quantitative characterization of the spectroscopic properties of upconversion nanocrystals (UCNC) has lagged behind the progress made in other areas of UCNC research. This lag has slowed the overall advancement of UCNC research because, fundamentally, it has been difficult to compare the performance and characteristics of UCNC used across different studies. The purpose of this paper is to suggest how best to acquire, analyze and interpret upconversion luminescence data such that the results can be used by the research community for meaningful comparison. Our suggestions are informed by conclusions drawn from the detailed analysis of the kinetics of the photodynamics processes leading to upconversion in beta-NaYF4:Yb, Er. However, the general conclusions presented here are applicable to all Yb-sensitized upconversion materials, and to most lanthanide-based upconversion materials in general. No attempt is made here to review the nuts and bolts of modelling the kinetics of electronic excited states, but rather to show how the results of such modelling can provide very useful conceptual guidelines for the correct interpretation of the spectroscopic data related to upconversion materials. Such modelling also suggests which measurements would be useful descriptors that would enable meaningful comparison of upconversion nanomaterials across different studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available